What's New
File Size:
257.72 kB
27 July 2009
While we think it can be improved, the finalisation of this document has the potential to improve the transparency of the development assessment process. However, the document does need to be changed.File Size:
227.27 kB
20 July 2009
We're asking for industry consultation before the Department of Planning adopts new model clauses or amends existing clauses. In relation to the existing clauses, we have concerns with clause 6.1 (Arrangements for designated State public infrastructure) and clause 6.4 (Development of the foreshore must ensure access).File Size:
161.87 kB
20 July 2009
We think the 1 per cent cap on percentage-based development levies should be kept in Burwood and Bankstown.File Size:
178.25 kB
17 July 2009
There is now a mandatory financial penalty for an applicant who amends their development application when it is before the Court.File Size:
387.65 kB
17 July 2009
Ryde Council has not considered the appropriateness of existing aims, objectives and development controls.File Size:
387.65 kB
17 July 2009
Ryde Council has not considered the appropriateness of existing aims, objectives and development controls.
File Size:
299.19 kB
17 July 2009
The purpose of this letter is to highlight our continued concerns with the draft plan which is now before the Department of Planning.File Size:
345.93 kB
15 July 2009
Some parts of the proposed legislation will significantly increase the regulatory risk of greenfield land development. Additionally, if the legislation proceeds as is, it will represent a missed opportunity to address fundamental shortcomings in the current legislative arrangements.File Size:
659.39 kB
03 July 2009
The NSW planning system reduces competition and stifles economic growth.File Size:
44.44 kB
